?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Zer Netmouse
February 27th, 2008
09:16 am

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Flag Next Entry
Bibliographic standard for Sfeditors wiki

(9 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
From:sethb
Date:February 27th, 2008 02:43 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The most recent year is most important, so should go at the top. Since the years are in reverse order, putting books within a year in forward order is as silly as the typical US date format.

Author is more important than title.

Generally, a single-author collection is obvious from the title ("The Best of X") but it might not be, and editing the works of one author differs from selecting works by many. I'd also be inclined to want to see whether something is a collection of original stories or of reprints (or a combination).
Netmouse on the web Powered by LiveJournal.com